Tragedy in Portlandia

I’m sure by now, many may have heard of the fatal shooting at a shopping mall in Portland, OR. It made the AP and Huffington Post within an hour of it’s occurrence. A single, short, dark-haired, masked gunman in camouflage and possibly body armor, using a civilian, semi-automatic version of a military weapon opened fire in the food court area. Several were wounded, one is in critical condition and two others were killed. Children waiting to sit on Santa’s lap, their families, and many, many others were terrified and traumatized. It was later discovered the gunman had apparently killed himself as well.

I only heard about it because a couple of my local Facebook friends shared a news link and status updates reassuring family and friends they were okay or expressing gratitude they had not chosen to do their shopping there during that time.

One young friend made the following observation:

20121211-210510.jpg
The location of the shooting to the rest of the country is Portland. For those of us who live here, the actual location, Clackamas Town Center (CTC) is in the county south of Portland and the stereotype is that the location of the shopping center tends to attract the more affluent and socially connected people in our area. Lloyd Center is the shopping center that is closest to downtown Portland and located in a more urban area which tends to be more of a central hangout for disenfranchised and disillusioned youth.

The apparent assumption is that responses were different due to stereotypes and the disparity of caring about the safety and well-being of one demographic above another. While this could be a factor, I believe a bigger factor is that the two locations lie within two different law enforcement and governmental jurisdictions. As well as the differences in the nature of the shootings. The truth is we don’t know the differences in how law enforcement personnel are trained or what matrices have been developed for responding to various scenarios.

What I do know is that it is way too easy to see a few facts, combine them with personal assumptions and beliefs, then come to a faulty conclusion that takes this kind of tragedy and reduces it to a cynical and apathetic response of, “If they don’t care what happens to me and my kind, why should I care what happens to them?”

Last night, after the shooting, was a parent Policy Council meeting and the woman I get a ride from is Latina and very active in immigration issues and working to improve inclusion and involvement for members of the Latino community. She was doing the verbal hand-wringing about why this had to happen here and wanting to know more about what really happened – a virtual looky loo of sorts. Her primary concern, after wanting to make sure people she knew who may have been there were okay, was to hope and pray that the gunman wasn’t Latino because of how it would affect the views and opinions of Latinos and detract from the social justice efforts in that portion of our community.

Again we see this us vs. them mentality. Generalized compassion for those who were directly affected was easily overridden by personal interest in an us vs. them social justice cause.

Then I read this:

20121212-084851.jpg
This was the response that resonated with me. Here is my response:

20121212-085420.jpg

It is an unpopular and seemingly irrational viewpoint to take, to be seen as coming to the defense of the villain. The fact of the matter is that at some point and at some time the person under the mask, the man behind the gun, would have been more than those facts about him. Somewhere along the way there would have been people who cared about him and whom he cared about. He was human and we do not know the things that led him to pull the trigger.

He had no right to pull it and to harm those he killed, injured, and terrorized. Those actions were intolerable and, had he lived, deserving of punishment. At some point he lost or surrendered his humanity to do what he did.

I am in no way defending or justifying his actions, I just hope that we don’t choose to let go of empathy, compassion, and the ability to care about more than what affects us directly because when we do that, we are letting go of our humanity as well.

Advertisements

8 comments

  1. There was clearly something emotionally or mentally wrong with that young man. There was something mentally or emotionally wrong with the football player who murdered his girlfriend and killed himself. The moment you think that picking up any kind of weapon and killing either people you love or complete strangers, you are mentally ill, because that is not a normal, healthy, or sane response to any situation. Mentally ill people do not get the treatment they need or deserve. You’re right in that it doesn’t excuse what they do, but it does put it into context.

    Gun control needs to be stronger. Mental health needs to be a priority, both in terms of accessability and acceptance. We cannot allow these horrible things to keep happening.

    Like

  2. I wonder if the disparate reactions between Portland and LA is that LA is inured to that kind of thing because it happens more often.
    I agree completely with what you’ve said, but I also wonder if some who commit these acts aren’t just unglued in some way that would have made him beyond help.

    I hope Portland (one of my favorite places) comes together after this, and the mental health services you talk about are made more available.

    Like

    1. El Guapo,
      Thank you. Becoming inured to this kind of tragedy and violence is a sad thing and I’m afraid it is happening everywhere. I am certain that you are correct that at the point this individual planned and carried out his destruction, he was beyond help.

      That being said, I am fairly confident that at one or more points along his personal timeline there was at least one person or an organization he was in contact with that might have been able to intervene and identify a concern or shift his trajectory. Sane and psychologically functional people do not carry these things out. I’m not saying he is not solely responsible and accountable for his actions. I am saying that as members and participants in society, we share in responsibility and accountability as well as the trauma and grief when these kind if events occur.

      Blessings,
      Kins

      Like

  3. I liked your take on this, and I will also be writing a post about this tomorrow. I agree that the shooter is absolutely guilty of harming innocent people, but there is also more at play behind the scenes. When you see people who do stuff like this on the news, or hear their stories, it is obvious it wasn’t a snap decision they made. It had been brewing for awhile.

    Like

    1. Jen,
      I completely understand and agree. I have already been on the receiving end of one person’s criticism as being a bleeding heart with my head stuck up my a** because I’m defending the murderer. I wasn’t defending him or his actions, I am stating that there are underlying causes and conditions which need to be explored and examined in order to do more as a society to identify, help and prevent people from doing these kinds of things from happening.

      I’m looking forward to your take on this.

      Be well,
      Kina

      Like

  4. Oh, how I agree with your post! It seems to me that the root of so much grief is not understanding that it is not US against THEM, but US ALL TOGETHER, all the time, everywhere, in every way. And that ANY gift of respect or kindness, no matter how small – builds a little trust, diminishes a little pain, maybe provides a tiny spark of caring where it is needed much, whether seen or not. Embraces humanity. Encourages humanity.

    Like

    1. RTG,
      Very well said. I wish we could find a way that each person could be open to exploring another’s viewpoint and realizing that opposing view and different experiences and knowledge doesn’t always mean one is wrong and the other is right. Life and the things we deal with are multi-dimensional and complex. Solutions to the ills in today’s world must take those things into consideration.

      Just because we may disagree or differ in our understanding or approach doesn’t mean one or the other is ignorant, blind or stupid.

      Blessings,
      Kina

      Like

Your feedback, thoughts, and input are appreciated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s